MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin Capitol Police have declined to investigate the leak of a state Supreme Court abortion order in June citing a conflict of interest, but the court’s chief justice told The Associated Press she is pursuing other options.
Chief Justice Annette Ziegler told AP via email on Thursday that she continues “to pursue other means in an effort to get to the bottom of this leak.” She did not respond to messages last week and Monday asking what those other means were. Other justices also did not return a request for comment Monday.
Ziegler called for the investigation on June 26 after the leak of a draft order that showed the court would take a case brought by Planned Parenthood that seeks to declare access to abortion a right protected by the state constitution. A week after the leak, the court issued the order accepting the case.
The draft order, which was not a ruling on the case itself, was obtained by online news outlet Wisconsin Watch.
Ziegler said in June that all seven of the court’s justices — four liberals and three conservatives — were “united behind this investigation to identify the source of the apparent leak. The seven of us condemn this breach.”
Ziegler told AP last week that the justices asked State Capitol Police to investigate the leak. That department is in charge of security at state office buildings, including the Capitol where the Supreme Court offices and hearing chamber are located. The police are part of Democratic Gov. Tony Evers’ administration.
That created a “clear conflict” given the governor’s “significant concern about outcome of the court’s decisions in addition to being named parties in several matters currently pending before the Wisconsin Supreme Court,” Evers’ administration spokesperson Britt Cudaback said.
Evers is not a party to the case where the order was leaked, but he has been outspoken in his support for abortions being legal in Wisconsin.
Cudaback said Capitol Police had a conflict because any investigation “will almost certainly require a review of internal operations, confidential correspondence, and non-public court documents and deliberations relating to any number of matters in which our administration is a party or could be impacted by the court’s decision.”
However, Cudaback said Evers’ administration agreed there should be a thorough investigation “and we remain hopeful the Wisconsin Supreme Court will pursue an effort to do so.”
Ziegler noted that unlike the U.S. Supreme Court, the state Supreme Court does not have an independent law enforcement agency that can investigate.
Investigations into the inner workings of the Wisconsin Supreme Court are rare and fraught.
In 2011, when Justice Ann Walsh Bradley accused then-Justice David Prosser of choking her, the Dane County Sheriff’s Department led the investigation. That agency took over the investigation after the chief of Capitol Police at the time said he had a conflict. But Republicans accused the sheriff of having a conflict because he was a Democrat who endorsed Bradley.
The Sauk County district attorney acted as special prosecutor in that case and declined to bring charges.
The leaked order in June came in one of two abortion-related cases before the court. The court has also accepted a second case challenging the 1849 abortion ban as too old to enforce and trumped by a 1985 law that allows abortions up to the point when a fetus could survive outside the womb.
Oral arguments in both cases are expected this fall.
The Wisconsin Capitol Police have come under scrutiny after refusing to investigate the leak of a state Supreme Court abortion order. The controversial order, which was leaked to the media before it was officially released, has sparked outrage and calls for accountability.
The leaked order, which was related to a case involving abortion restrictions in the state, was seen as a major breach of confidentiality and raised concerns about the integrity of the judicial process. Despite calls for an investigation into the leak, the Wisconsin Capitol Police have stated that they will not be pursuing the matter.
This decision has raised questions about the independence and effectiveness of the Capitol Police in handling sensitive and politically charged cases. Critics argue that the refusal to investigate the leak undermines public trust in the justice system and sends a message that leaks of confidential information will not be taken seriously.
In response to the backlash, the Wisconsin Capitol Police have defended their decision, stating that they do not have jurisdiction over leaks of court documents and that it is up to the court to address any breaches of confidentiality. However, many are calling for a more thorough investigation into the matter to ensure accountability and prevent future leaks.
The leak of the state Supreme Court abortion order has highlighted the need for stronger safeguards to protect the confidentiality of court documents and prevent unauthorized disclosures. It has also raised concerns about the potential for political interference in judicial proceedings and the importance of maintaining the independence of the judiciary.
Moving forward, it is crucial that steps are taken to address the leak of the state Supreme Court abortion order and ensure that similar breaches of confidentiality do not occur in the future. The Wisconsin Capitol Police must be held accountable for their decision not to investigate the leak and steps must be taken to restore public trust in the integrity of the justice system.
