Former President Donald Trump has waived his right to be present at his arraignment in his new federal election interference case and has authorized his attorney to enter a plea of not guilty on his behalf, according to a filing Tuesday.
Special counsel Jack Smith unsealed a new indictment last week related to Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The superseding indictment includes the same charges as the original indictment, but removes allegations related to Trump’s official acts as president in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity.
The court has not yet set a formal date for Trump’s new arraignment.
Both sides are due to appear in court on Thursday for a previously-scheduled conference in the case.
Former President Donald Trump awaits the start of proceedings on the second day of jury selection at Manhattan criminal court, April 16, 2024, in New York.
Justin Lane/AP, FILE
Trump last year pleaded not guilty to federal charges of undertaking a “criminal scheme” to overturn the results of the 2020 election in order to remain in power.
In July, the Supreme Court ruled in blockbuster decision that Trump is entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts undertaken while in office.
Former President Donald Trump is set to enter a not guilty plea and waive his right to attend the arraignment in the election interference case against him. The case, which alleges that Trump attempted to pressure officials in Georgia to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, has been a focal point of controversy since the results were certified.
Trump’s decision to enter a not guilty plea and waive his right to attend the arraignment is not uncommon in legal proceedings. By entering a not guilty plea, Trump is maintaining his innocence and forcing the prosecution to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Waiving his right to attend the arraignment allows Trump to avoid the media circus that would likely surround his appearance in court.
The election interference case against Trump has been closely watched by both his supporters and detractors. Supporters argue that Trump was well within his rights to challenge the results of the election, while detractors claim that his actions were an abuse of power and an attempt to subvert democracy.
Regardless of one’s opinion on the case, it is clear that Trump’s decision to enter a not guilty plea and waive his right to attend the arraignment will have significant implications for the legal proceedings moving forward. As the case continues to unfold, it will be important for all parties involved to respect the legal process and allow for a fair and impartial trial to take place.
