WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said Monday it won’t hear an appeal from the social media platform X over a search warrant prosecutors obtained in the election-interference case against former President Donald Trump.
The justices did not explain their reasoning and there were no noted dissents.
The company, known as Twitter before it was purchased by billionaire Elon Musk, says a nondisclosure order that blocked it from telling Trump about the warrant obtained by special counsel Jack Smith’s team violated its First Amendment rights.
The company also argues Trump should have had a chance to exert executive privilege. If not reined in, the government could use similar tactics to invade other privileged communications, their lawyers argued.
Two nonpartisan electronic privacy groups also weighed in, encouraging the high court to take the case on First Amendment grounds.
Prosecutors, though, say the company never showed Trump had used the account for official purposes so executive privilege wouldn’t be an issue. A lower court also found that telling Trump could have jeopardized the ongoing investigation.
Trump used his Twitter account in the weeks leading up to his supporters’ attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to spread false statements about the election that prosecutors allege were designed to sow mistrust in the democratic process.
The indictment details how Trump used his Twitter account to encourage his followers to come to Washington on Jan. 6, pressured his Vice President Mike Pence to reject the certification and falsely suggested that the mob at the Capitol — which beat police officers and smashed windows — was peaceful.
That case is now inching forward after the Supreme Court’s ruling in July giving Trump broad immunity from criminal prosecution as a former president.
The warrant arrived at Twitter amid rapid changes instituted by Musk, who purchased the platform in 2022 and has since laid off much of its staff, including workers dedicated to ferreting out misinformation and hate speech.
He also welcomed back a long list of users who had been previously banned, including Trump, and endorsed him in the 2024 presidential race.
The Supreme Court recently made a decision not to hear an appeal from Elon Musk’s X platform regarding a warrant in a case involving former President Donald Trump. The case, which dates back to 2018, centers around a warrant issued by a lower court for information related to Trump’s Twitter account.
The warrant was issued as part of an investigation into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election. The X platform, which is owned by Musk’s company, was asked to provide information related to any interactions between Trump and Russian officials on the platform.
Musk’s X platform argued that the warrant was overly broad and violated the First Amendment rights of its users. The company also raised concerns about the privacy implications of turning over such information to the government. However, lower courts upheld the warrant, prompting X platform to appeal to the Supreme Court.
In declining to hear the appeal, the Supreme Court effectively upheld the lower court’s decision and allowed the warrant to stand. This decision has significant implications for the ongoing investigation into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.
The case highlights the complex legal issues surrounding social media platforms and their role in investigations involving public figures. It also raises questions about the balance between privacy rights and law enforcement interests in cases involving high-profile individuals.
Overall, the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the appeal from Elon Musk’s X platform in the Trump case underscores the importance of upholding legal standards and ensuring that investigations are conducted in a fair and transparent manner.
