A growing effort backed by Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, to switch Nebraska’s electoral process to winner-take-all hit a major snag on Monday after a key state lawmaker said he wouldn’t support such a change before the November election.
State Sen. Mike McDonnell, one of the key Republicans holdouts GOP Gov. Jim Pillen was looking to for support to break a likely filibuster, said in a statement that he would not vote to change electoral process before then.
Instead, McDonnell said he believed the legislature should take up the issue in next year’s legislative session, which tentatively starts the first week of January 2025.
“In recent weeks, a conversation around whether to change how we allocate our electoral college votes has returned to the forefront,” McDonnell said. “I respect the desire of some of my colleagues to have this discussion, and I have taken time to listen carefully to Nebraskans and national leaders on both sides of the issue. After deep consideration, it is clear to me that right now, 43 days from Election Day, is not the moment to make this change.”
Nebraska State Sen. Mike McDonnell of Omaha is shown in the Legislative Chamber in Lincoln, Neb., March 1, 2019.
Nati Harnik/AP, FILE
“I have notified Governor Pillen that I will not change my long-held position and will oppose any attempted changes to our electoral college system before the 2024 election,” he added. “I also encouraged him and will encourage my colleagues in the Unicameral to pass a constitutional amendment during next year’s session, so that the people of Nebraska can once and for all decide this issue the way it should be decided — on the ballot.”
Pillen released a statement last week saying he would not call a special session unless Republican legislators show they have 33 votes needed to break an expected Democratic filibuster.
ABC News spoke to Nebraska Rep. Mike Flood, who agreed that McDonnell was a key holdout and understood the Nebraska legislature needed at least three more votes to break a very likely filibuster.
If the other state Senate holdouts stand firm, McDonnell’s decision effectively throws cold water on the ongoing effort to switch the state’s Electoral College vote to winner-take-all, even after Republican members of Congress and Trump pushed for the change.
A pedestrian walks through Capitol Park as the Nebraska State Capitol is seen in the background, Oct. 26, 2023 in Lincoln, Nebraska.
Joshua Lott/The Washington Post via Getty Images, FILE
Flood, a Republican who represents Nebraska’s 1st Congressional District, said Trump engaging directly on the issue “underscores how big of a deal this is.” Flood, who supports changing the process, said Nebraska “has the right to speak with the majority of its citizens, by and through its legislature, and that’s what I want to see done.”
The winner-take-all electoral change would be pivotal if the Republican-leaning state allocates all of its five electoral votes solely to Trump, instead of dividing them with Vice President Kamala Harris.
Nebraska split its electoral votes in 2020, with President Joe Biden flipping the 2nd district, which includes Omaha. Without gaining the votes from Nebraska’s 2nd district, Harris could not win the general election with “blue wall” of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania alone. It would also create a new possibility for a 269-269 Electoral College tie.
“It is amazing to think that could come down to Nebraska, but I think the math and the reality is that it very well may be true,” Flood said when asked about the stakes of the possible switch.
ABC News’ Nathaniel Rakich contributed to this report.
Nebraska Republican Leader Opposes Trump’s Attempt to Alter State’s Electoral Vote Process
In a surprising turn of events, a prominent Nebraska Republican leader has come out against President Trump’s recent attempts to alter the state’s electoral vote process. This move has sparked controversy within the party and raised questions about the future of the electoral system in the state.
The leader in question, Senator Ben Sasse, has been a vocal critic of President Trump in the past, but his opposition to this particular issue has caught many by surprise. In a statement released earlier this week, Sasse expressed his concerns about the president’s efforts to change the way Nebraska allocates its electoral votes.
Currently, Nebraska is one of two states that does not follow the winner-takes-all system for allocating electoral votes. Instead, the state awards one electoral vote to the winner of each congressional district, with the remaining two votes going to the overall winner of the state. This unique system has been in place since 1991 and has generally been well-received by both parties.
President Trump’s recent proposal would change this system to a winner-takes-all format, which would likely benefit Republican candidates in future elections. However, Senator Sasse believes that this change would undermine the integrity of the electoral process and set a dangerous precedent for future elections.
In his statement, Sasse argued that altering the state’s electoral vote process would be a “terrible idea” and would only serve to further divide the country. He also expressed concern that changing the rules at this late stage could lead to legal challenges and further erode public trust in the electoral system.
Sasse’s opposition to President Trump’s proposal has been met with mixed reactions from within the Republican party. Some have praised his courage in standing up to the president, while others have accused him of betraying the party and siding with Democrats.
Despite the controversy surrounding this issue, it is clear that Senator Sasse’s decision to oppose President Trump’s attempt to alter Nebraska’s electoral vote process has sparked an important conversation about the future of the electoral system in the state. As the debate continues, it will be interesting to see how this issue plays out and what impact it may have on future elections in Nebraska and beyond.
