The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will take up a constitutional challenge to state bans on gender-affirming care for minors in its next term.
The case from Tennessee involves the 15-year-old transgender daughter of Samantha and Brian Williams of Nashville.
The family alleges that Senate Bill 1, which prohibits certain types of medical treatments for minors with diagnosed gender dysphoria, violates the Equal Protection Cause of the 14th Amendment.
By denying only transgender youth access to these forms of medically necessary care while allowing non-transgender minors access to the same or similar procedures, SB 1 discriminates against transgender youth, they argue.
“It was incredibly painful watching my child struggle before we were able to get her the life-saving health care she needed. We have a confident, happy daughter now, who is free to be herself and she is thriving,” plaintiff Samantha Williams said in a statement.
An exterior view of the Supreme Court on June 20, 2024 in Washington, DC.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
“I am so afraid of what this law will mean for her. We don’t want to leave Tennessee, but this legislation would force us to either routinely leave our state to get our daughter the medical care she desperately needs or to uproot our entire lives and leave Tennessee altogether,” she said. “No family should have to make this kind of choice.”
Tennessee is home to more than 3,000 transgender adolescents, according to the American Civil Liberties Union, which is representing the Williams family in the case.
Republican lawmakers in Tennessee and other states with similar laws contend that each state is free to regulate medical standards and procedures as it sees fit.
Twenty-five states have passed bans on gender-affirming care, including Florida, Ohio and Montana, where the laws are currently on hold under court order during litigation.
The Supreme Court is set to consider a ban on gender-affirming care for minors, a move that has sparked controversy and debate across the country. The case, which is scheduled to be heard in the coming months, centers around a law passed in a conservative-leaning state that prohibits healthcare providers from offering gender-affirming treatments to individuals under the age of 18.
Gender-affirming care, also known as transgender healthcare, encompasses a range of medical interventions and treatments that are designed to help individuals transition to their affirmed gender. This can include hormone therapy, puberty blockers, and gender confirmation surgery. For many transgender and gender non-conforming youth, these treatments are crucial in alleviating gender dysphoria and improving their mental health and well-being.
Proponents of the ban argue that minors are not capable of making informed decisions about their gender identity and should not be allowed to undergo irreversible medical procedures. They also claim that gender-affirming care could have long-term negative effects on a child’s physical and mental health.
However, opponents of the ban argue that denying transgender youth access to gender-affirming care can have devastating consequences. Studies have shown that transgender youth who are denied access to these treatments are at a higher risk of depression, anxiety, and suicide. By restricting access to gender-affirming care, the ban could further stigmatize and marginalize an already vulnerable population.
The Supreme Court’s decision in this case could have far-reaching implications for transgender and gender non-conforming youth across the country. If the ban is upheld, it could set a dangerous precedent for other states to follow suit and restrict access to essential healthcare for transgender individuals.
It is important for the Supreme Court to consider the well-being and rights of transgender youth when making their decision. All individuals, regardless of age, deserve access to healthcare that affirms their gender identity and supports their mental health. It is crucial that the court upholds the rights of transgender youth to access gender-affirming care and rejects any attempts to deny them this essential treatment.
