The ongoing trial of James Crumbley for manslaughter

The ongoing trial of James Crumbley for manslaughter

James Crumbley’s trial continued on Monday in its third day of testimony. The prosecution has sought to place blame on him, claiming he could have prevented the shooting if he had not ignored the warning signs exhibited by his son leading up to the November 2021 shooting.

The father of a Michigan school shooter is facing four counts of involuntary manslaughter for his alleged role in the shooting. His son Ethan Crumbley, who was only 15 years old at the time of the shooting, killed four of his classmates and injured seven others.

Tate Myre, 16; Hana St. Juliana, 14; Madisyn Baldwin, 17, and Justin Shilling, 17, were killed in the shooting.

James Crumbley’s trial comes weeks after Jennifer Crumbley was found guilty of the same four charges. She will be sentenced in April. Their cases are a rare instance of parents being held criminally responsible in connection with a shooting carried out by their child.

Ethan Crumbley was sentenced to life in prison without parole in December after he pleaded guilty to 24 counts including first-degree premeditated murder and terrorism causing death.

PHOTO: In this Feb. 8, 2022, file photo, Jennifer Crumbley, left, and James Crumbley, right, the parents of Ethan Crumbley, appear in court for a preliminary examination on involuntary manslaughter charges in Rochester Hills, Mich.

In this Feb. 8, 2022, file photo, Jennifer Crumbley, left, and James Crumbley, right, the parents of Ethan Crumbley, a teenager accused of killing four students in a shooting at Oxford High School in Oxford, Mich., appear in court for a preliminary examination on involuntary manslaughter charges in Rochester Hills, Mich.

Paul Sancya/AP, FILE

The parents had bought their son the gun used in the shooting just days before. Prosecutors have argued that the parents ignored warning signs raised against the shooter which could have prevented it from happening.

Among the signs was a meeting called by school officials the morning of the shooting after concerning and violent drawings were found on their son’s math test. After a school counselor spoke with Ethan Crumbley, they expressed concerns that he may harm himself.

School officials called the Crumbley parents to the school and told them their son needed immediate mental health care, offering them a list of facilities that could have provided him care that day. But, the parents allegedly told school officials they needed to return to work and could not take their son home.

The shooting happened that afternoon.

PHOTO: James Crumbley, father of Oxford High School shooter Ethan Crumbley, reacts to testimony on the first day of his trial on four counts of involuntary manslaughter, on March 7, 2024, at Oakland County Circuit Court in Pontiac, Mich.

James Crumbley, father of Oxford High School shooter Ethan Crumbley, reacts to the testimony of then Oakland County Sherriff’s Office Detective Edward Wagrowski on the first day of his trial on four counts of involuntary manslaughter for the deaths of 4 Oxford High School students who were shot and killed by his son, on March 7, 2024, at Oakland County Circuit Court in Pontiac, Mich.

Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

During Jennifer Crumbley’s trial, she admitted on the stand that she would have been able to leave work for the day on the morning of the shooting to care for her son. Her former boss had revealed she could have also brought her son to work with her if she needed to.

Last week, prosecutors argued that James Crumbley set his own hours and could have taken his son with him while he worked that day, since he was a DoorDash driver. Prosecutors also presented evidence that he had not yet signed onto work for the day before the meeting at the school, only logging on at 11 a.m.

James Crumbley also made a 911 call to police after news of the shooting had spread after he had discovered that the gun he purchased for his son was missing from their home. He identified his son as the suspected shooter, despite police not making that information public yet.

James Crumbley’s communications from prison have been limited by Judge Cheryl Matthews until the jury reaches a verdict after he allegedly made threats from prison toward an undisclosed person. He will be allowed to conduct research and communicate with his attorney on matters related to his defense.

PHOTO: James Crumbley, father of Oxford High School shooter Ethan Crumbley, re-enters the courtroom after a break on the first day of his trial on four counts of involuntary manslaughter, on March 7, 2024 at Oakland County Circuit Court in Pontiac, Mich.

James Crumbley, father of Oxford High School shooter Ethan Crumbley, re-enters the courtroom after a break on the first day of his trial on four counts of involuntary manslaughter for the deaths of four Oxford High School students who were shot and killed by his son, on March 7, 2024 at Oakland County Circuit Court in Pontiac, Mich.

Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

Opening statements in the trial began on Thursday after the jury was seated on Wednesday. The jury consists of nine women and six men.

The ongoing trial of James Crumbley for manslaughter has captured the attention of the nation as the details of the case continue to unfold. Crumbley, the father of Ethan Crumbley, who is accused of carrying out a deadly school shooting at Oxford High School in Michigan, is facing charges of involuntary manslaughter for his alleged role in the tragic incident.

The prosecution has argued that Crumbley failed to secure his firearm, which ultimately allowed his son to gain access to the weapon and carry out the deadly attack. They have presented evidence showing that Crumbley purchased the gun used in the shooting and did not properly store it, despite knowing that his son had exhibited concerning behavior in the past.

In addition to the firearm negligence charges, Crumbley is also facing accusations of failing to take action after being alerted to disturbing drawings and messages found in his son’s backpack just hours before the shooting occurred. The prosecution has argued that Crumbley should have taken immediate steps to address his son’s mental health issues and prevent him from carrying out such a violent act.

On the other hand, Crumbley’s defense team has maintained that he was not aware of the extent of his son’s mental health struggles and did not intentionally contribute to the tragedy. They have argued that Crumbley should not be held responsible for his son’s actions and that he should not be charged with involuntary manslaughter.

As the trial continues, experts and legal analysts are closely watching the proceedings to see how the case will unfold. The outcome of this trial could have far-reaching implications for gun owners and parents across the country, as it raises important questions about accountability and responsibility in cases involving gun violence.

Regardless of the final verdict, the trial of James Crumbley serves as a stark reminder of the devastating impact of gun violence and the importance of responsible gun ownership. It also highlights the need for improved mental health resources and support for individuals who may be at risk of carrying out violent acts.

As the trial moves forward, the nation will be watching closely to see how justice is served in this tragic case and what lessons can be learned to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.