Live Updates on the E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case: Judge Criticizes Trump for Lack of Self-Control
The defamation case filed by writer E. Jean Carroll against former President Donald Trump has been making headlines since its inception in 2019. The case revolves around Carroll’s accusation that Trump sexually assaulted her in the 1990s, which he vehemently denies. As the legal battle unfolds, recent developments have shed light on the proceedings, with a judge criticizing Trump for his lack of self-control.
Here are the live updates on the E. Jean Carroll defamation case:
1. The Allegation:
In June 2019, E. Jean Carroll accused Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. Carroll detailed the incident in her memoir, prompting Trump to deny the allegations and claim he had never met her, despite a photograph showing them together at a social event.
2. Defamation Lawsuit:
In November 2019, Carroll filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump, arguing that his denials damaged her reputation and subjected her to public ridicule and threats. The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages.
3. Department of Justice Intervention:
In September 2020, the Department of Justice (DOJ) attempted to intervene in the case, seeking to replace Trump’s private lawyers with government attorneys. The DOJ argued that Trump’s denial of the assault fell within his official duties as President. However, in October 2020, a federal judge rejected the DOJ’s bid, allowing Carroll’s lawsuit to proceed.
4. Trump’s Legal Defense:
Trump’s legal team has sought to dismiss Carroll’s lawsuit, arguing that his denials were protected speech under the First Amendment. They claimed that his statements were political rhetoric and not factual assertions.
5. Request for DNA Sample:
In March 2021, Carroll’s legal team requested a DNA sample from Trump to compare it with genetic material found on the dress she wore during the alleged assault. The request aimed to support Carroll’s claim and refute Trump’s denial. However, Trump’s lawyers fought against providing the sample, arguing that it was unnecessary and invasive.
6. Judge’s Criticism:
On October 26, 2021, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan criticized Trump for his lack of self-control during a hearing. Referring to Trump’s public statements about Carroll, the judge stated, “No one is above the law. It is not acceptable for anyone to make false statements of fact about anyone, including the President of the United States.” Judge Kaplan’s remarks highlight the importance of accountability and truthfulness, even for individuals in positions of power.
7. Discovery Process:
The case is currently in the discovery phase, where both parties exchange evidence and information relevant to the lawsuit. This process allows each side to gather facts and build their respective cases. The DNA sample request is part of this discovery process.
8. Implications:
The outcome of this case could have significant implications for future defamation lawsuits involving public figures. It raises questions about the extent to which public officials can be held accountable for their statements and whether they are immune from legal action while in office.
As the E. Jean Carroll defamation case continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the importance of truthfulness and accountability in public discourse. The judge’s criticism of Trump’s lack of self-control underscores the need for responsible speech, regardless of one’s position or power. The case also highlights the ongoing struggle for justice and the complexities surrounding allegations of sexual assault.
